Tag: Raymond Aimos

Wooden Crosses (1932)

Wooden Crosses (1932)

War’s horror is really palpable in this French WW1 classic, made by people who were there

Director: Raymond Benard

Cast: Pierre Blanchar (Gilbert Demachy), Charles Vanel (Corporal Bréval), Gabriel Gabrio (Suplhart), Raymond Aimos (Fouillard), Antonin Artaud (Vieublé), René Bergeron (Hamel), Raymond Cordy (Vairon), Marcel Delâite (Sergeant Berthier)

If you have any doubts about the deep scars World War One left on Europe, you can brush them off with a viewing of Wooden Crosses. Adapted from a gruelling novel by Roland Dorgelès, a former corporal in the 39th Infantry Division, Wooden Crosses is really a version of Dorgelès own hideous experiences in the trenches. Although it was largely overlooked outside France – like Westfront 1918 it lives in the shadow of All Quiet on the Western Front – it had a huge impact on France, being screened for veterans and for the President himself, many of them reduced to tears.

It tells of the never-ending slaughter inflicted on the 39th Infantry Division, partially through the eyes of a young law student Gilbert Demachy (Pierre Blanchar) who arrives determined to do his duty, even while under few optimistic ideals about the war. Introduced to the rest of his platoon by the gruff but fatherly Corporal Bréval (Charles Vanel) and cynical joker Sulphart (Gabriel Gabrio), Demarchy does his duty in several campaigns (with only brief respites from the front) while the soldiers around him die frequently and suddenly for a few more feet of mud.

Benard recruited actors and crew who had experienced the trenches, and Wooden Crosses is all about recreating the pitiless grimness of the front lines. The world the film creates is immaculately done in its grim squalor: the trenches are carefully reconstructed, a shelled-out church (“Our Lady of the Squaddies” as the troops call is) is perfectly sub-divided into a hospital (echoes of Pabst’s Westfront) for the wounded and dying and always the mud and desperation is palpable. The chances of heroism are few and far between, and the soldiers main goal seems to be to knuckle down and try to survive – even when the odds are impossible.

But, taking advantage of new film technology, it’s the sound of war that fills Wooden Crosses. The constant barrage of shells was carefully researched – after all each type of shell had a different sound – and long stretches of Wooden Crosses seem to be filled with nothing but the relentless pounding of the ears from mortar and shell fire. The horrific volume of war is captured here like few other films, which means the sudden bursts of near-silence carry real impact. For its in the silence we hear other sounds, the constant post-battle desperate pleas of the dying and wounded carried on the breeze. At one point Gilbert literally places his hands over his ears to drown out an incessant begging from a wounded comrade caught in No Man’s Land.

Its these moments that hammer home the soldier’s powerlessness. These people can’t be helped – that man making those sounds Gilbert has already had two attempts to rescue him, that just led to the death of the rescuers. Rescue is probably futile anyway. During a battle in a cemetery Gilbert risks his life to save another man, who promptly dies anyway – with all his pain, regret, anger and fear spewing out of him in front of his fellow soldiers. Powerlessness isn’t just listening to suffering: the platoon is forced to sit in their trenches listening to German miners digging beneath them, knowing the moment that digging sound stops their trench will be detonated – and that they can’t leave their post until their (disbelieving) officers give them permission.

No wonder they are hardened to battle. When a man dies in a foxhole, the others lift his body up to use him as a parapet. When an error in French artillery ranging means they end up firing on their own patrol, it’s met with irritation but muted acceptance that it’s just the way it is. There is a closeness among the soldiers, but it has that underlying current of knowing any of them could be gone forever at any time. When one of their late number receives a letter after his demise, the rest look away from the mailman with awkwardness, until Gilbert takes the letter to tear it up above the man’s grave.

Bernard visually contrasts this with some well-handled symbolism. He opens the film with rows and rows of soldiers, who transform in a single cut to rows and rows of crosses. The crosses become recurrent images. That battle in a cemetery is littered with them, hanging over or casting shadow over the characters, nearly all of whom are of course doomed. Bernard acknowledges the false excitement of the early mobilisation, with a montage of crowds rushing to volunteer to fight the good fight – but fades from this to a single image of an older woman staring out sadly from the camera, standing in for a whole generation of mothers about to lose their sons.

He ends the film – with our nearly last survivor piteously shedding his stoicism to die alone and afraid in No Man’s Land with a bullet in his belly – with a super-imposed montage of both stocks and shares and then wreaths tumbling past the screen (clear what he believes the motives and cost of war really was), before a final montage of soldiers carrying their crosses, Christ-like, through No Man’s Land. This meat grinder war, fought for profit, has left millions dead and for what? It’s hard to know or understand. And for all the soldiers never lose their determination to do their duty, never once do we get a sense of any patriotic idealism in them. No sense that anyone feels they are on a crusade, just a grim, unpleasant duty they need to get out of the way.

Wooden Crosses has a host of strong performances, each of them passionately committed. Pierre Blanchar is admirably reserved as Gilbert, his humanity tightly controlled below the surface. Charles Vanel is excellent as the gruff Sergeant, worried about his wife’s fidelity back home. Gabriel Gabrio makes his platoon cynic a man with a strong streak of decency. They are marshalled superbly by Bernard in a film full of power and despair at the horror men do.

Quai des Brumes (1938)

Jean Gabin and Michèle Morgan are star-crossed lovers in Quai des Brumes

Director: Marcel Carné

Cast: Jean Gabin (Jean), Michel Simon (Zabel), Michèle Morgan (Nelly), Pierre Brasseur (Lucien), Édouard Delmont (Panama), Raymond Aimos (Quart Vittel), Robert Le Vigan (Le peintre), René Génin (Le docteur), Marcel Pérès (Le chauffeur), Léo Malet (Le soldat), Jenny Burnay (L’amie de Lucien)

It translates as “Port of Shadows” and it’s the shadows you are likely to remember in this noirish tinged classic of French cinema. A major success story when it was released in France, it also stands as some sort of milestone as being one of the few films condemned by both the pre-Vichy French government and Nazi Germany. More pleasingly, it’s also a firm testament to the brilliance and vibrancy of pre-War French cinema and the creative imagination of Marcel Carné.

Jean (Jean Gabin) is a soldier on the run, deserting his regiment to lead his own life in South America. Arriving in the port of Le Havre, he ends up in a run-down bar on the edge of the town where he meets the beautiful young Nelly (Michèle Morgan) a woman on the run herself from two unpleasant men. The first is local gangster Lucien (Pierre Brasseur) a braggart with whom Jean has already had a few run-ins. The other, even more dangerous, is Zabel (Michel Simon) Nelly’s godfather, a ruthless man under a genial façade who is obsessed with Nelly. Jean and Nelly fall in love, but how far will Jean go to put his own hopes for the future in doubt to protect Nelly?

Shadows dominate Carné’s beautifully atmospheric film. Jean emerges as if from nowhere on the road to Le Havre – nearly run over by the truck driver who picks him up. The bar is buried in the mists of the town. Shadows loom from every building and throw most of the city into a mysterious half-light. The action largely takes place in backrooms and cellars. Every frame tells you from the start things will not turn out well, with every decision carrying an underplayed air of foreboding. You can just tell every moment is putting another nail in the coffin of Jean’s chances of escape to that new life. The film is a brilliant slice of noir, expertly assembled with an artist’s eye by Carné, one of the most overlooked genius directors of his era. 

This darkened, gloomy style of the picture echoes the intentions of Carné and his regular collaborator, scriptwriter Jacques Prévert. The focus on the picture is the individual – in this case Jean and Nelly –trying to escape the control of both the state (the army) and also the domineering bullies that hold the local power (Lucien and Zabel). It’s no coincidence that Jean is an army deserter, and there is no sense of guilt on his part or even a fraction of recrimination is aimed towards him from anyone he encounters. Jean himself talks despairingly of the grim reality of killing and his wish to make his own choices. Carné was originally to make the film in Germany, but Goebbels was not having any film made in Berlin where the hero was an army deserter. 

So instead the film was shifted – wisely – back to France, not the French government was that happy either. With Carné and Prévert’s vision of a listless, tired, corrupted France where people like Jean simply refuse (it seems) to do what they are told, and where the few representatives of local government we meet are trivial non-entities, it’s not a surprise that the film was soon being blamed for sapping French spirit. As a sop to the French criticism of the script (and many of the films backers were desperate for its downbeat nihilism to be replaced by a more conventional upbeat, romantic ending) Jean does at least show respect for his army uniform – despite everything it’s never dirty, and when he takes it off its neatly folded. Today it seems even more like an impressionistic touch.

It’s the nihilism that runs through the film. We know Jean is good guy – he encounters a dog on the road to Le Havre that follows him with a singular devotion, unable to bear being parted from him – but the film itself has a shadowy feeling of despair and destruction throughout. Jean feels like a doomed hero from the start, a passive figure despite his bravado, who impulsively drifts from event to event – it’s when he chooses to become engaged that he dooms himself. Nelly is seemingly at first a femme fatale – and her reveal is a masterstroke of cinema – but really she’s as much a victim as Jean, someone very vulnerable, lonely and scared who wants a way out but can’t see how to even begin to find one. But then even the nemesis that runs through the film is low-key and trivial – Lucien is a joke, while Zabel for all his creepiness is also little more than a novelty gift shop owner.

The power of the film comes from seeing these two trapped figures surrounded by a world of darkness, listless depression and emptiness. And of course from the performances. The film is a reminder again that at this time Jean Gabin may well have been the greatest actor in the world. With a cigarette dangling, raffish cool under a surly salt-of-the-earth taciturnity, he turns Jean into the sort of enigmatic noir-hero years before the term was evented. Dripping with charisma in every frame, he’s both a Bogartish cynic and a De Niroish slice of muscle, a working class martyr. Nearly as good is Michèle Morgan, vulnerable and yearning into a surface of sexy cool. The two make a winningly attractive pair, not just sexy but with a growing romantic feeling.

It’s no wonder Jean throws himself into threatening and roughing up the pathetically weasily Lucien (Pierre Brasseur very good as a weak-willed bully who can lash out with the viciousness of a child) and squaring up to domineering Zabel. Michel Simon is terrific as the grandfatherly shop owner whose own dark obsessions and possible perversions become harder and harder to ignore. These two very different threats stand at opposite ends of the film and both contribute to its bleak ending.

Because of course Jean isn’t going to make that boat. The act of violence the film finally unleashes – after all that foreboding warning that it’s coming – is suitably shocking in a 1930s way, while the eventual fall of Jean is both fitting and also tragic in its low-key abruptness (it was later echoed by Brian de Palma in Carlito’s Way). With its gloomy atmosphere, its grim foreboding but also passionate love story at its heart, Quai des Brumes is a classic of French poetic realism.